<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Canon EF 100mm/2.8 Macro</title>
	<atom:link href="http://vafer.org/blog/20071028100918/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://vafer.org/blog/20071028100918</link>
	<description>ramblings of a creative mind</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 07 Mar 2010 01:54:16 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: tcurdt</title>
		<link>http://vafer.org/blog/20071028100918/comment-page-1#comment-45806</link>
		<dc:creator>tcurdt</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 06 Nov 2007 16:29:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://vafer.org/blog/20071028100918#comment-45806</guid>
		<description>Well, there is &lt;a href=&quot;http://blog.dennisonbertram.com/hackmaster/2005/02/build-your-own-ring-flash.htm It&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;a cheap version of a ring flash&lt;/a&gt;. It does not look very professional - but before I run around with a hole in my wallet... ;-) Maybe worth just the fun of playing with it.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Well, there is <a href="http://blog.dennisonbertram.com/hackmaster/2005/02/build-your-own-ring-flash.htm It" rel="nofollow">a cheap version of a ring flash</a>. It does not look very professional &#8211; but before I run around with a hole in my wallet&#8230; ;-) Maybe worth just the fun of playing with it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Andrea Campi</title>
		<link>http://vafer.org/blog/20071028100918/comment-page-1#comment-45797</link>
		<dc:creator>Andrea Campi</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 06 Nov 2007 14:52:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://vafer.org/blog/20071028100918#comment-45797</guid>
		<description>Yeah, depth of field is expected to be shallow--on the other hand, it&#039;s also said to have a nice quality to its bokeh, which is one of the reason for its fame as a portrait lens.
If you have a lot of money burning a hole in your wallet :-) you could get a ring flash or even a Macro Twin (http://www.usa.canon.com/consumer/controller?act=ModelInfoAct&amp;fcategoryid=141&amp;modelid=7282), that should also help in freezing any movement.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yeah, depth of field is expected to be shallow&#8211;on the other hand, it&#8217;s also said to have a nice quality to its bokeh, which is one of the reason for its fame as a portrait lens.<br />
If you have a lot of money burning a hole in your wallet :-) you could get a ring flash or even a Macro Twin (<a href="http://www.usa.canon.com/consumer/controller?act=ModelInfoAct&amp;fcategoryid=141&amp;modelid=7282)" rel="nofollow">http://www.usa.canon.com/consumer/controller?act=ModelInfoAct&amp;fcategoryid=141&amp;modelid=7282)</a>, that should also help in freezing any movement.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
